If I’m ever in need of inspiration when doing lengths at my local pool (and believe me, I am!) then I can take heart from the fact that it’s run by an award winning Social Enterprise.
Greenwich Leisure Ltd (or GLL for short) has actually being going since 1993, and runs 90 leisure centres in London in partnership with local authorities. And what makes them a “social enterprise”? Well, in their words:
We are a values-based organisation and we recognise our responsibility towards our customers, employees and the environment, within the communities we serve. Any financial surpluses we generate are reinvested to provide long-term benefits for our customers, employees and the communities where we operate.
We aim to encourage community involvement and to promote healthy living. We work to increase levels of physical activity by delivering sport and health programmes that reach all sectors of the community.
For me there’s a double dose of good here, as they are ploughing all profits back into improving their services (including investing in their staff) and they’re also providing affordable and accessible fitness facilities for the community. (I go there largely because you can pay-as-you-go and aren’t hit with the large monthly fees of most other London gyms.)
However, another reason for sharing my (sporadic) fitness regime with you is because GLL have also been awarded a Social Enterprise Mark, which has led me to find out more about the scheme. My take on this is that it’s aiming to do something along similar lines to the now instantly recognisable Fair Trade Mark. Their hope is that people will start to look for the mark when choosing and using products and services, and they already have a growing list of enterprises who have qualified. And who does qualify? These are their criteria:
- Does it have social and/or environmental aims?
- Does it have its own constitution and governing body?
- Are at least 50% of company profits spent on socially beneficial purposes?
- Does it earn at least 50% of its income from trading?
- Can it demonstrate that social/environmental aims are being achieved?
- If the company ceased trading would remaining assets be distributed for social/environmental purposes?
I would be surprised if there are many punters out there who would recognise the mark yet, or (to be honest) be particularly motivated by the values it represents (particularly when laid out in these rather dry terms), but that was also true in the early days of Fair Trade, and we now see Fair Trade products on the shelves of every major supermarket. If consumers have been motivated to buy Fair Trade (for the benefit of producers in the developing world) and organic (for the benefit of the environment and their own health) might they now be motivated to choose providers who are investing something back into the community closer to home?
Only time will tell, but it does feel as if this may be the moment, and this met (yet) be the Mark.